<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Flower Kitten</title>
	<link>http://flowerkitten.com</link>
	<description>A sad place for both</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>72ppi at 640px, Or why Scott Borne is still wrong.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[So Scott Bourne wrote at&#194;&#160;http://photofocus.com/2011/03/09/dispelling-common-photo-myths-ppi-does-matter/ that PPI matters when there is a set pixel dimension. Basically saying that PPI can effect file size at a given resolution(pixel dimentions). It cant, and here is why. PPI is used as a method of defining image resolution in relation to document size. You have your pixels per inch, <a href='http://flowerkitten.com/2011/03/11/72ppi-at-640px-or-why-scott-borne-is-still-wrong/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<link>http://flowerkitten.com/2011/03/11/72ppi-at-640px-or-why-scott-borne-is-still-wrong/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dear Aperture, I hate you.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I have grown increasingly annoyed at some issues with image quality and today I am sorely disappointed in apertures RAW decoding. The problem seems to occur when an over exposed image has a smooth fall off into a normally exposed area causing posterizing around the highlight area. It is most noticable in certain tonal <a href='http://flowerkitten.com/2010/07/22/dear-aperture-i-hate-you/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<link>http://flowerkitten.com/2010/07/22/dear-aperture-i-hate-you/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

