<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flower Kitten &#187; Aperture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowerkitten.com/tag/aperture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowerkitten.com</link>
	<description>A sad place for both</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Aperture, I hate you.</title>
		<link>http://flowerkitten.com/2010/07/22/dear-aperture-i-hate-you/</link>
		<comments>http://flowerkitten.com/2010/07/22/dear-aperture-i-hate-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowerkitten.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I have grown increasingly annoyed at some issues with image quality and today I am sorely disappointed in apertures RAW decoding. The problem seems to occur when an over exposed image has a smooth fall off into a normally exposed area causing posterizing around the highlight area. It is most noticable in certain tonal <a href='http://flowerkitten.com/2010/07/22/dear-aperture-i-hate-you/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="flickr-image alignnone" title="comparison" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thelostvertex/4818826666/" rel="flickr-mgr"><img class="flickr-medium" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4114/4818826666_05c130d985_b.jpg" alt="comparison" /></a></p>

<p>Recently I have grown increasingly annoyed at some issues with image quality and today I am sorely disappointed in apertures <span class="caps">RAW </span>decoding.</p>

<p>The problem seems to occur when an over exposed image has a smooth fall off into a normally exposed area causing posterizing around the highlight area. It is most noticable in certain tonal ranges as we see. The worst part is Adobe Camera Raw has non of these problems, neither does <acronym title="canons raw decoding software">DPP</acronym>. It turns out that the problem is also noticable in <span class="caps">OSX&#8217;</span>s Finder previews, but to a much lesser degree. This seems to imply to me that the problem goes beyond just Aperture, and is applicable to everything that uses Apples Camera Raw decoding. It also means Aperture is doing something special in addition, which is exacerbating&Acirc;&nbsp;the problem.</p>

<p>Higher res&Acirc;&nbsp;<a href="http://flowerkitten.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/jpeg_examples.zip">jpeg_examples</a> available.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flowerkitten.com/2010/07/22/dear-aperture-i-hate-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

